Last Updated on April 20, 2026 by Monica Castillo
I kept waiting for the show to stumble.
That’s what happens when a series writes out the character who’s been holding its center of gravity. You brace for the wobble, the awkward recalibration, the sense that everyone left behind is pretending nothing’s missing. When Sullivan’s Crossing opened its fourth season without Sully, I was ready to feel the gap.
Strangely, I didn’t. Not in the way I expected.
Sully, Scott Patterson, all quiet authority and weathered charm, doesn’t haunt these first two episodes so much as linger at the edges. The characters mention him. They adjust. Life, inconveniently, goes on. And the show makes a choice that feels almost defiant: it doesn’t chase his absence. It trusts that the world of Timberlake is sturdy enough to hold without him.
That confidence changes the rhythm of everything.
The opening hour settles in like a familiar place you haven’t visited in a while. The same soft light over the trees, the same unhurried pacing, that theme song, “Time and Time Again” doing a lot of emotional heavy lifting before a single line of dialogue lands. It’s inviting, maybe even a little sentimental. But it works because the show doesn’t rush to justify itself. It just exists for a while.
And then it complicates things.
Maggie, played by Morgan Kohan, feels more settled than I’ve ever seen her. Not static, there’s a difference, but grounded. There’s a moment early on where she talks about staying, about building something in Timberlake instead of returning to the high-stakes world she came from. The scene isn’t written like a declaration. It’s quieter than that. Almost tentative. Like she’s testing the idea out loud.
Kohan understands that hesitation. She doesn’t oversell it.
Across from her, Chad Michael Murray continues to play Cal as a man who’d rather listen than speak, which is harder than it sounds. Their chemistry isn’t built on grand gestures. It’s in the pauses, the unfinished sentences, the sense that both of them are trying not to push too hard on something fragile.
Recommended: Your Friends & Neighbors Season 2 Parents Guide
Of course, the show pushes anyway.
Liam arrives, Marcus Rosner, calm and unexpectedly disarming, and drops the kind of revelation that usually belongs in a louder show: he claims he’s Maggie’s husband. It’s the sort of twist that makes you worry the series is about to abandon its restraint. For a moment, I thought it might.
It doesn’t. Not entirely.
What surprised me is how human Liam feels. He isn’t written as a disruptor so much as a reminder, of a past Maggie hasn’t fully explained yet, maybe hasn’t fully understood herself. There’s a scene between them that plays almost too simply: no shouting, no dramatic score swelling underneath. Just recognition, confusion, and something unresolved hanging in the air. I found that more interesting than the reveal itself.
The show seems to know that the situation is familiar. It leans instead on how these specific people respond to it.
Elsewhere, the relationships continue to fray in quieter ways. Sydney and Rafe circle a disagreement about marriage that neither can neatly resolve. Lola and Jacob exist in that uncomfortable middle ground where commitment and distance keep colliding. These aren’t explosive conflicts, but they feel lived-in. Messy in a recognizable way.
Then there’s Edna and Frank, still the emotional anchor of the series. Andrea Menard and Tom Jackson give the kind of performances that don’t call attention to themselves. Frank’s protectiveness after Edna’s surgery could’ve turned saccharine. Instead, it reveals something more complicated, fear, mostly. Fear of losing what you’ve already nearly lost. The show lingers on her recovery longer than I expected, and I was grateful for that. It doesn’t treat healing like a narrative inconvenience to be rushed through.
Not everything here works. Some plot turns still feel like they’re inherited from a more melodramatic version of the show, one that occasionally resurfaces. You can sense the writers nudging events into place. But even then, the performances tend to pull things back toward something believable.
One of the more welcome changes is what the show doesn’t do this time. The tension between Maggie, Lola, and Sydney, once stretched thin by unnecessary rivalry, has eased into something more generous. They support each other. They talk like people who actually like one another. It sounds basic. It shouldn’t be rare. And yet.
The new characters slip in without much fuss. Colby Frost’s Ben carries a quiet tension I couldn’t quite pin down at first, something guarded beneath the surface. He says one thing, his face suggests another. It’s subtle, and it makes you watch him a little closer. Meanwhile, Jonathan Silverman shows up with a dry, slightly irritated energy that the show uses for a bit of humor without letting it drift into caricature.
By the end of the second episode, I realized something had shifted. Not dramatically. The show hasn’t reinvented itself. It hasn’t suddenly become sharper or darker or more ambitious than it was before.
It’s just… steadier.
For three seasons, Sullivan’s Crossing often felt like it was trying to figure out what kind of story it wanted to tell, how much drama to lean into, how much quiet to preserve. These episodes suggest it’s finally stopped overthinking that question. It knows its pace now. Its interests. The kinds of moments it wants to hold onto.
Sully’s absence could’ve exposed every weakness the show had. Instead, it’s done something more interesting.
It’s revealed what was already there, waiting for a little more room to breathe
Violence and intensity are minimal, but not nonexistent. The most affecting material comes from Edna’s recovery after brain surgery—there’s no graphic imagery, but the emotional aftermath lingers. You see fatigue, frustration, the kind of vulnerability that might land harder than anything physical. A few tense confrontations pop up, mostly verbal, and they feel grounded rather than heightened. No fights breaking out, no weapons, nothing designed to shock.
The language stays in that TV-PG lane. Conversations feel natural, sometimes strained, occasionally sharp, but the show doesn’t lean on profanity to make a point. You might hear mild swearing here and there, nothing that hangs in the air or defines a scene. No slurs, no language meant to provoke. It’s the kind of dialogue you’d expect from people who are trying sometimes unsuccessfully to be decent to each other.
Sexual content is handled with the same restraint the show applies to everything else. Relationships matter here, and the camera tends to stop short of anything explicit. There’s kissing, there’s intimacy implied, and there’s a storyline built around a complicated romantic past that raises questions without turning voyeuristic. Nothing graphic, nothing that would feel out of place in a family living room, though younger viewers might not grasp the emotional context underneath it.
Drinking shows up socially shared beers, casual moments, the kind of thing that signals community more than excess. No drug use to speak of, and smoking isn’t a presence. The show doesn’t moralize about any of it; it just exists in the background, like it does in real life.
As for age, this sits comfortably in the early-teen range and up. Kids around 12 or 13 could follow the story without issue, though they might find the pacing slow and the conflicts a bit abstract. Older teens will get more out of the relationship dynamics, the quiet tensions, the things left unsaid.
Recommended: Hacks Season 5 Parents Guide
